Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Role of Trust and Privacy Concerns in AI Chatbot Adoption for Islamic Mobile Banking

Authors

  • Adi Indradi Universitas Ma'soem, Indonesia
  • Nur'aeni Universitas Ma’soem, Indonesia
  • Hasti Pramsti Kusnara Universitas Ma’soem, Indonesia
  • Ade Iskandar Nasution Universitas Ma’soem, Indonesia
  • Lina Artika Sobirin Universitas Ma’soem, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v10i2.3046

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence Chatbot, Behavioral Intention, Islamic Banking, Mobile Banking, Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

This study aims to examine the factors influencing customers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward using AI chatbots in Islamic mobile banking applications by extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with trust and privacy concern variables. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected from 292 Islamic bank customers in Greater Bandung, Indonesia. The proposed research model was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that perceived usefulness has a positive and significant effect on attitude toward using AI chatbots, while perceived ease of use and trust do not significantly influence attitude. Interestingly, privacy concern demonstrates a positive and significant relationship with attitude, indicating that privacy-aware customers may develop favorable evaluations of chatbot services when adequate data protection mechanisms are perceived. Furthermore, attitude toward using AI chatbots significantly influences behavioral intention to use the technology. The mediation analysis shows that attitude mediates the effects of perceived usefulness and privacy concern on behavioral intention, whereas the indirect effects of perceived ease of use and trust are not statistically significant.

References

Abdullah, A., et al. (2023). The adoption of conversational assistants in the banking industry: Is the perceived risk a moderator? Heliyon, 9(9), e20220

Aisyah, M., Sesunan, Y. S., & Wicaksono, A. T. S. (2025). Customers’ trust in Islamic banking post-cyberattack leads to digital service breakdowns in Indonesia. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101530.

Alagarsamy, S., & Mehrolia, S. (2023). Exploring chatbot trust: Antecedents and behavioural outcomes. Heliyon, 9(5), e16074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16074

Aldboush, H. H., & Ferdous, M. (2023). Building trust in fintech: An analysis of ethical and privacy considerations in the intersection of big data, AI, and customer trust. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), 90.

Amellal, O. (2026). The influence of data privacy concerns on trust and intention to use AI chatbots in online banking platforms among millennials [PhD Thesis, Vilnius University]. https://epublications.vu.lt/object/elaba:277676334/

Aslam, W., Ahmed Siddiqui, D., Arif, I., & Farhat, K. (2023). Chatbots in the frontline: Drivers of acceptance. Kybernetes, 52(9), 3781–3810.

Azli, N. (2023). Examining factors influencing attitude and adoption of chatbots among consumers [Master’s thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia]. URL

Çelik, A., & Özköse, H. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model with trust and perceived risk to explain mobile banking adoption. Contemporary studies in economic and financial analysis.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080

Febriandika, N. R., & Hakimi, F. (2023). Determinants of consumer adoption of Islamic mobile banking services in Indonesia. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(4), 30.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hamadou, I., Yumna, A., Hamadou, H., & Jallow, M. S. (2024). Unleashing the power of artificial intelligence in Islamic banking: A case study of Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI). Modern Finance, 2(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.61351/mf.v2i1.116

Hasan, S., Godhuli, E. R., Rahman, M. S., & Al Mamun, M. A. (2023). The adoption of conversational assistants in the banking industry: Is the perceived risk a moderator? Heliyon, 9(9). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(23)07428-5

Jafri, J. A., Amin, S. I. M., Rahman, A. A., & Nor, S. M. (2024). A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on Fintech adoption in banking. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22980

Khomsatun, S., Salmah, S., Nadia, T., Taslimah, Z., & Dilsantuah, N. (2024). -Z Acceptance of mobile banking for sharia bank: do tam-model, religiosity intention, and security variables matter? Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 18(2), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v18i2.359

Kim, D., & Song, H. (2024). Designing an age-friendly conversational AI agent for mobile banking: The effects of voice modality and lip movement. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 188, 103262

Lappeman, J., Marlie, S., Johnson, T., & Poggenpoel, S. (2023). Trust and digital privacy: Willingness to disclose personal information to banking chatbot services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-022-00154-z

Lim, K. B., Low, K. H., Yeo, S. F., & Tan, C. L. (2025). Factors influencing generation z’s adoption of ai in banking: an extended technology acceptance model approach. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 12(4), 178–192.

Limakrisna, N., & Moeins, A. (2024). Intelligent banking chatbot: intention to continue through millennial customer satisfaction in indonesia using the tam method. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA), 4(6). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=27213021&AN=175892152&h=y4clv7%2FRx4R9KyMszEOwnA9oVwFQyLEKRqhTJvixhAEvbmVBjfOT8eFFGhUPCoHnYzMphNSeLLIVHziZy4WSyQ%3D%3D&crl=c

Marjerison, R. K., Dong, H., Kim, J.-M., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y., & Kuan, G. (2025). Understanding user acceptance of ai-driven chatbots in china’s e-commerce: the roles of perceived authenticity, usefulness, and risk. Systems, 13(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020071

Nada, Z. Q., & Setyono, J. (2023). Integration of technology acceptance model in the use of mobile banking among millennial generations of sharia bank customers in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economics Research, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijier.v5i1.8785

Nguyen, T. H., & Le, X. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence-based chatbots – a motivation underlying sustainable development in banking: Standpoint of customer experience and behavioral outcomes. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2443570. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2443570

Park, Y., Kim, J., Jiang, Q., & Kim, K. H. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot characteristics on customer experience and customer satisfaction. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 34(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2024.2362654

Richad, R., Vivensius, V., Sfenrianto, S., & Kaburuan, E. R. (2019). Analysis of factors influencing millennial’s technology acceptance of chatbot in the banking industry in Indonesia. International Journal of Management, 10(3). https://www.academia.edu/download/59390817/IJCIET_10_03_24320190525-118499-17409dm.pdf

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4 [Computer software]. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com

Rodríguez Cardona, D., Janssen, A., Guhr, N., Breitner, M. H., & Milde, J. (2021). A matter of trust? Examination of chatbot usage in insurance business. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/4100540a-989a-4500-8490-0df12f126472/download

Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review1. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989-A27.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suhartanto, D., Dean, D., Ismail, T. A. T., & Sundari, R. (2019). Mobile banking adoption in Islamic banks: Integrating TAM model and religiosity-intention model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(6), 1405–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2019-0096

Suhartanto, D., Setiawan, S., & Safitri, F. M. (2026). AI-enabled brand experience and Shariah compliance in Islamic digital banking. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 1–20.

Suhartanto, D., Syarief, M. E., Chandra Nugraha, A., Suhaeni, T., Masthura, A., & Amin, H. (2021). Millennial loyalty towards artificial intelligence-enabled mobile banking: Evidence from Indonesian Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(9), 1958–1972. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2020-0380

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Yaqin, M. A., Adriani, S. K., & Kholis, N. (2025). Algorithmic trust and digital gharar: A Maqāṣidiyyah framework for evaluating blockchain in Islamic trade systems. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 3(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijema.v3i1.1072

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Indradi, A., Nur’aeni, Kusnara, H. P., Nasution, A. I., & Sobirin, L. A. (2026). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Role of Trust and Privacy Concerns in AI Chatbot Adoption for Islamic Mobile Banking. Almana : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 10(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v10i2.3046

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.